Thursday, April 30, 2009

Middle East Focus: A Yom Hashoah Paradox

- - -


This is the second in a series on "Why the Geneva UN Conference (Durban II) Matters" - The general theme is that what happens in the working of the UN General Assembly and its committees is incredibly instructive about the biased rhetoric that seeps into the debate over Israel and the Middle East here in this country. And why this matters to the average person - YOU - is that this is the rhetoric that well meaning liberal progressives in this country parrot thinking it is the truth. Unfortunately - that is absolutely not where the truth comes from - and all you have to do is pay attention to see it.

This entry will focus on reflections from this past Yom Hashoah (Holocaust Memorial Day) as words our community celebration in Boston served to be a sharp contrast from what Mahmound Ahmedinijad - the poster boy for the bias of this body - had said during the conference and in interviews since.

Yes, just as I was wrapping up my initial article on President Ahmadinejad and his role at the UN Conference in Geneva (Durban II), I was also trying to get my head into a place to attend the community's Yom Hashoah commemoration at Faneiul Hall.

To summarize, I asked everyone to watch the video from the morning's "This Week with George Stephanopolis" and pay particular attention to two things:

1) That the Iranian president was not an aberration, but a crystal clear reflection of what so many around the globe think of Jews and Israel.

2) That his critique of both was so wrapped up in a clear cultural bias against Jews and Israel that arguments rarely follow reason. It is like when a bigot is trying to explain why he is better than another race. People with a reasoned mind can only role their eyes.

Here is the link again to the video interview with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7398354

When asked why he doesn't think the Holocaust happened, he takes two very significant approaches.

1) First, he never talks about History. HE ONLY TALKS ABOUT ISRAEL. In America, we want so much to separate anti-Israel feelings from anti-Jewish feelings. But you really can't when the rest of the world cannot separate feelings about Israel from feelings about Jews. The Holocasut is clearly a Jewish related event yet Ahmdinejad immediately begins talking about how the Holocaust - if it happened was Europe's fault and so they should not have "created" Israel and harmed the Arabic peoples living in Palestine. Of course in saying this, two things are revealed. He has no desire to acknowledge any historical presence of Jews in the land, or any History of a kingdom or country of the Hebrew tribes. But, in the same conversation where he says he DOES NOT BELIEVE THE HOLOCAUST HAPPENED - he also asks the world to believe that IT DID HAPPEN but since IT HAPPENED IN EUROPE THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN CARE OF THEIR GUILT OVER IT SOME OTHER WAY THEN with the state of Israel. And Historically, this negates the generations of Jews who never left Israel, the thousands who settled there in the 1800's, and the thousands who settled throughout the early years of the 20th century.

I hope people can get a sense for how challenging it is to counter such logic. Can he have it both ways? Can the Holocaust be BOTH a lie perpetrated by Jews to create the State of Israel and at the same time a TRUTH by which European guilt created the state of Israel. Can both of these be in any way relevant when the History shows Israel was on a path to re-establishment in some way well before the Holocaust? As I said, it makes no sense, yet people march in the streets in America to defend these views and the countries and leaders from around the globe who subscribe to the same hypocrisy. I meet with people every day who think Jews have no business there and never did. Amazing.

However, as I try to explain in my presentations, so much of the anti-Israel commentary in this country is not really about details of the current crisis. It is bias, inconsistent argumentation, and age old anti-Jewish sentiment wrapped up in a neat little bundle. And of course once anyone says that truth, that any part of this Israel thing is about anti-Jewish bias, they are labeled as the boy who cried wolf - or the boy who cried anti-Semitism - which of course is the neat little invalidator of any argument in support of Israel. Even thought it is the truth in so many cases.

2) Now if that weren't bad enough, there was another interesting comment Ahmadinejad made that stuck in my mind that afternoon at the Yom Hashoah event. The Iranian President asked why the Holocaust was like a "Holy" thing for Jews - such that it could not be questioned. It is History he said. Ah yes, yet another contradiction. Either it is History or it isn't Mr. President. And if it is, then I guess you deny the overwhelming evidence from one of the most studied events in our time. But whether it is or isn't really shouldn't be something you have the right to claim. If you want to start debating what a religion calls Holy, I think your glass house is shattering - ye of the cartoon protesters.

I have actually heard something similar from fellow Jews - that we shouldn't be so sensitive to critique of the Holocaust. I have also said it in the past in another way. I believe that the numbers we generally throw around may just be higher than what was documented. (Many scholars have acknowledged this). Also, there may very well be inconsistencies in stories or places where X happened but not Y. And of course there are the few - very few - survivors who have fabricated stories. These prove to be the irrlevent fodder for deniers like Ahmadinejad. What is the truth is that 4 or 5 million would be NO different than 6 million. The roots, evolution, and growth of what we know of as the Holocaust is as real as the sun in the sky. That is the key to this debate. What's more, the key note address at the community celebration asked. "Why is the commemoration of the Holocaust not MORE HOLY?" This is a charge we have to deal with.

He mentioned the calamities that befell Jews that are remembered in other "real" holidays - like Tisha B'Av and Purim, and spoke of how the numbers killed in the Holocaust so overshadow the deaths in ALL the other calamities, that it should be given a fast day, or place in our calendar similar to the other HOLY DAYS. Some would say maybe this is beause the event is too recent. But Purim was once "too recent" as well. In fact, there was once great debate as to whether it should have the stature it currently has.

What really came through strong however was a question about ALL the Jewish Holidays. Are they not ALL about ZACHOR - about remembrance? And if the are, does Yom Hashoah not deserve a place of even greater significance?

I would say it does. And here is where I wrap this up. I believe it doesn't have as strong a place because so many Jews would join with Ahmedinejad in thinking that "Jews talk too much about the Holocaust" - a classic commentary used to vilify Jews around the globe that taps into every Jewish conspiracy theory ever constructed. As with so many issues in the lives of Jews these days - we are our own worst enemies. When President Ahmadinejad can get traction in the Jewish community with comments about why the Holocaust should be treated like a holy day - you can see part of the problem.

And then I hear from a wise Rabbi - why isn't the Holocaust MORE holy to us. And I ask the same thing. And it sounds alot like the question - why isn't Israel MORE holy to us as well.

And now I am going to an Israeli independence celebration.



Monday, April 27, 2009

The Cohen Side Middle East Blog - Why The "Durban II" UN Conference Matters - Part I (Oh Mahmoud!)

- - -



Please watch this video of an interview with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7398354

It is excellent context for the the next series of posts which will address both the content and an analysis of the recently concluded UN Conference on Racism in Geneva (or the Durban Review Conference - "Durban II")


Please keep in mind a few things as you watch this video:

1) DO NOT think this conference or this issue is not relevant to YOU. If you are either concerned or confused about the entire issue of Israel and the Middle east - this matters to you. I am consistently approached by friends and colleagues who simply DO NOT know what to make of this issue. Either they are fiercely supportive of Israel and don't know how to defend her - or they are fiercely biased against Israel and are sorely uninformed and misled. This conference and this issue can be used as an EXCELLENT CASE STUDY as to why Israel needs to be supported even as it can be criticized. For anyone who considers themselves a "progressive" or "liberal" or "human rights advocate" and is either supportive or not supportive of Israel, this CASE STUDY will show you how the game of Israel Demonization is played on the international stage and how it poisons any hope of civil dialogue in this country over the issue.

2) DO NOT think of the Iranian President as "crazy" or "insane". That was the same mistake people made when analyzing the Holocaust. The minute you think Hitler's views were "crazy" or not common to his people, you miss all the lessons the Holocaust has to offer. Ahmadinejad is simply the guy who says what everyone else is thinking but is afraid to say in public for the Western media. This analysis is in no way going "easy" on Iran or its President. What he says is abhorrent and destructive. But to dismiss him as a clown condemns us to ignore the widespread bias and bigotry toward Jews and Israel that is very real in most corners of the world.

3) DO NOT think that because this view is critical of the conference, the UN, and Iran that the point is to condemn the UN as a whole or the Palestinian cause. The opposite is the case and anyone who would wish to throw out the UN baby with the UN bathwater simply does not undersatand all the good the UN does and how important it is. The conference is simply an example of how the operations of the UN, when dominated by the popular vote of the member nations, are themselves responsible for deflecting the discussion of so many global human rights causes at the expense of a disproportionate focus on condemnation of Israel - even at the expense of real solutions and help for the Palestinian people.

4) DO NOT dismiss his criticism of the US or his denial of the Holocaust - it is at the heart of understanding the large majority of beliefs of people in the region. When you listen to Ahmadinejad discuss talks with the US and then discuss the Holocaust, notice the difference. In his comments about the US, he makes sense. Why would Iran immediately trust a country who has ostracized Iran for 30 years, simply because Obama tells the press he wishes to improve relations? If the Iranian president is right, and no official outreach has been made, he is still waiting for proof. That makes sense. It is reasonable and must be respected. Then when he starts talking about the Holocaust he does not use reason - but the comments are no less useful. He never says why he believes the Holocaust never happened. He just believes it. He never responds to the claim that the Holocaust has been one of the most studied topics in History. He just repeats twice that if it did happen, it was done by the West and should never have been used to displace Palestinians. He also states that it should not still be used to justify the right of Israel to exist. His view of the Holocaust is not about History. It is about Jews, his belief in their manipulation of the World, and the Western guilt that he believes created Israel. Now as much as I could say we need to hammer home the Jewish historical and spiritual claim to the land, the continued presence in the land over the past 3000 years, and the significant numbers who returned to cultivate the land well before WWII - IF WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE BELIEVE ALL OF WHAT HE BELIEVES AND THAT IT IS AT THE HEART OF GLOBAL ENMITY TOWARD ISRAEL, JEWS, AND THE WEST, WE WILL NEVER LEARN WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH AND THE JUSTIFIED FEAR AND WORRY ISRAEL HAS WHEN ASKED TO "MAKE PEACE" IN THIS CONTEXT ... As I have said, we could talk 'til we are blue in the face about "dual narratives", about how we must respect "two Historical claims to the land", but it will NOT CHANGE THE DEEP SEEDED BELIEF OF MANY THAT JEWS DON'T BELONG THERE.

By the way - my counter to that is this:
Q: To any supporter of Palestinians who does not believe Israel should ever have been founded or was founded through genocide - ask this question - "If in 2000 years, this issue is not resolved, will the Palestinian claim on the land be any less just?" If they say of course not, then ask them why the Jewish/Israeli claim to the land is any less just. This is about two peoples having two valid claims to the same land, being at war over it, and now having to work out a solution that respects both claims.

If you listen to the last comments Ahmadinejad makes about respecting what the Palestinians would vote for, he is clearly stating that if Palestinians want all Jews out of the land, the world should respect that.

Now in future posts I will go into further detail and analysis about this issue and the conference itself. Here is a link to a portion of his actual speech.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swEeQCG5AZk

Remember, don't think crazy. Think justifiably pissed off about the US and the West while harboring deep seeded cultural anti-Semitism and anti-Israel beliefs. I will focus on this so closely because for those who think anti-Semitism is not a factor in the Israel issue - here is the proof in the pudding. His views are a reflection of larger cultural trends that are at the heart of the modern UN's outlandish focus on Israel AND the backbone of what seeps into Liberal-Progressive American views about Israel. What many of your friends who are in that camp don't realize is that their well-meaning commitment to "Human-Rights" as it is contextualized by the UN and global media is largely an outgrowth of irrational anti-Semitism around the world and in the member nations of the UN. It creates the biased reports, conferences, and claims of atrocities that well meaning Americans latch onto and believe hook, line, and sinker. They have been fooled by extremists whose only goal is to discredit Israel in the hopes of someday eradicating it. These extremists are not interested in a political solution that includes an "Israel" and are not interested in helping the Palestinians and Israelis make peace any time soon.

More to come .... especially on the danger to the future of human rights if this trend is not understood.

- - -

Monday, April 13, 2009

Iraq Redux - The Meaning of Success

- - -

I recently wrote about the ludicrous column in the Globe by Jeff Jacoby where he tries to give a 2009 "I told you so!" to everyone who ever criticized the war in Iraq.

Bush's 'folly' is ending in victory (March 25)http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/25/bushs_folly_is_ending_in_victory/

I was waiting to write this additional follow-up for two reasons:

1) I was waiting to see an inevitable tragedy so I could use a hard core example of how full of crap this "victory" idea was.
2) I wanted to do some research to give people the best way to find out on their own how much of an offense to common sense and decency that assertion really was.

Check out this recent globe article as just one example of how precarious things are over there.
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2009/04/12/suicide_bomber_kills_9_sunni_fighters_in_iraq_on_payday/

And trust me, this is not the only incident. Actually, don't trust me, look for yourself to see the number of incidents of well, extremist terrorism against the population of Iraq that the US still has no idea how to stop.

And on that eternal idea of having no idea how to stop such insurgent activity, I had claimed that the message behind the Jacoby piece was not just that things were better, but that it was all worth it in the end. I not only have video footage from many in Iraq who will categorically state that as bad as Saddam was, things are just horrible right now. While things are better than they were just a year ago, the life people can lead in Iraq in 2009 is a pale shadow in comparison to what life was like before the invasion.

But I really don't even want to debate the "better off" argument. What I really want to do is what I love - REMINDING PEOPLE OF HISTORY. Jeff clearly doesn't.

I recently reviewed an EXCELLENT FRONTLINE SEGMENT called BUSH'S WAR
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND that every History teacher buy it and use it in class when teaching this unit. I also HIGHLY ENCOURAGE anyone who wants to be informed on the issue but is not a huge reader to get the video as well. You can also try You Tube to get a glimpse:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&q=bush#

You will see that the issue really isn't about 2009 versus 2007 or 2008. This issue is all the needless death that took place because of the mis-steps of this Administration. And look, the "What - you liked Saddam?" argument just doesn't fly. One could argue we were containing him just fine. (Look it up!) But even if you go with the "Maybe the invasion was a good call given the 9/11 context" - there were just SO many screw ups that dragged this thing on and caused SO many American and Iraqi lives to be lost.

I will NEVER let people like Jeff Jacoby or anyone else try to rewrite History to make this all seem like a good thing that is wrapping up very nicely right now - thank you very much.
- - -