Thursday, December 1, 2011

Responding to the Atlantic Monthly Article on Israeli Views Toward American Jews


There have been so many people talking about this article in the Atlantic monthly that I thought I would post a response from a private Facebook group of Jewish educators.

I also wanted to include a photo of a recent cover article from the Atlantic called "Is Israel Finished". It may or may not be important in understanding whether there is an agenda to show the uglier side of Israel (the complicated side of Israel I might call it) but I thought you should see it.


The link to the main article is below and the revised post is below that. It should be noted that these views are personal and do not reflect the views of any agency or synagogue I have or currently work for.

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/11/netanyahu-government-suggests-israelis-avoid-marrying-american-jews/249166/#.TteLTIny5qg.facebook




While there are no easy answers here, I will tackle the ad's and the article on three levels. Also, having had direct experience working with Israeli's on just these issues, I think there is great understanding to be had. This is NOT just another example of Israel being bad. There are real, heartfelt issues going on here that Israeli's care deeply about. And when they care that much, we have to take it for what it is and understand that they do not express themselves - especially to each other - worrying about how we feel about the very self evident facts they are pointing out. Its called brutal honesty and instead of looking for the insult, maybe we should be looking at the kernels of truth.


In response to my progressive Jewish educator friends who asked how to frame this for their students, I asked them to think about three things:


1) How, in general do progressive Jews promote Israel while knowing the whole time more progressive rabbis are not considered Rabbi's in Israel? Do we bring it up as the first thing we mention about Israel on Yom Haatzmaut ? No. It is one of those very difficult and nuanced conversations we have to handle very delicately. Yet, we do go on, every day, supporting Israel and teaching Israel to our kids.


There is gender discrimination at the holiest place in Judaism, yet we all do careful programming around inter-denominational Judaism to help our kids understand and respect the differences between orthodox Judaism and progressive Judaism. We also tell all our girls to wear long skirts or pants and cover their shoulders at the Kotel. We disagree, respect, and educate. This should be no different - despite the fact hat we don't get the same understanding in Israel. This is also despite the fact that we are most likely looked down upon by many religious Israelis, would get yelled at for not following protocol at the Kotel and probably arrested if women went to the men's section there. If we have avoided all these issues with our kids then we have made our own bed. If we have confronted them somehow - we would use the same approach on this issue.


2) The issue of Yom Hazicharon and Yom Hashoah are different issues altogether. Americans are held in wide contempt in Israel in MANY segments of society for our lack of widespread awareness of, or observance of Yom Hazicharon and Yom Hashoah. As many of you know, on both days Israel comes to a complete halt - literally. The programs I was working on for the past two years showed me how much Israeli's really are angry with us for such a lame recognition of both days of remembrance. In fact, the main reason the government ministry I worked with contributed so much money to the project was precisely because our Israeli partners felt so strongly about the idea of educating Americans about Yom Hashoah and Yom Hazicharon. There is no question that despite our wonderful Yom Hashoah commemorations - we do not come together as a Jewish community around that day like they do in Israel and certainly not around Yom Hazicharon. And they just cannot understand it. In fact, one of my lay leaders broke down in tears at our final reception having finally gotten it - that these young, beautiful soldiers risk their lives every day for ALL of us and we don't do nearly enough to recognize them. One cannot deny that if you leave Israel - you leave that widespread appreciation for those who risk their lives for Israel. That is what I see this particular video saying. It is a cold hard truth. But it is the truth. As for the Channukah video - again - a lotof things to unpack here, but I know I knew about Christmas before I knew about Channukah simply because it was everywhere. Again - it is a cold hard truth that they video creators are playing upon for their own purposes of retaining Israel's population.


3) Also keep in mind that the ministries OFTEN do things on their own. There is no real accountable hierarchy over there and they OFTEN embarrass the prime minister's office and the image of Israel (in our minds) with poor timing, poor tact (a western concept not an Israeli one) and a hard hand. Just remember the building demolitions that took place when Biden was in Israel. In our minds it was embarrassing and rude. But it was not done by Netanyahu's office and that ministry might actually have been trying to show Bibi and the US that they don't take orders from the US - no matter who is in town.


There are clearly many issues lying beneath the surface of all of this. I just wanted to respond with these three initial ideas.

- - -






Saturday, May 21, 2011

Obama, Israel, and Land Swaps - Nothing New Here.

Is Obama's statement on Israel anything new? No. This commentary and speech by G.W. Bush in 2008 is clear evidence that there may be a bit of an over-reaction here.

Click this link to view (I wish I could embed the video here - but since MSNBC's embed codes are always the wrong video, I can't)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/43115123#43115123

(original post 5/11)

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck's "Nazi" Problem: Jon Stewart and Chris Matthews Call Them Out!

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Bill O'Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies
http://www.thedailyshow.com/
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire Blog</a>The Daily Show on Facebook


Jon Stewart slams O'Reilly for defending the claim that Fox does not use the anlaogy, while Chris Matthews calls out Glenn Beck for his outrageous rants that blatantly foments violence with his "shoot them in the head" comments. (Also Google Byron Williams to read about someone who acted on these exhoratations)

(Click Photo for Video Link)



Really Glenn, Karl Marx is our Washington and Nancy Pelosi is a "revolutionary?" Readers, please understand how many people really believe all this. And readers who think Glenn is the gospel, watch the interviews where Glenn admits this is more entertainment than news. What a confluence of idiocy!



---

Monday, January 24, 2011

Using Holocaust Analogies Appropriately - Yes it CAN be done!

The Holocaust remains one of History's greatest lessons about propaganda and the manipulation of people for political goals. It CAN be used without calling someone a Nazi and without people always thinking they are being called Nazi's.


This past week, Representative Steve Cohen (D-Tenn) has been blasted all over the bloggosphere and the cable news networks. From both the right and the left, there is a strange consensus that his comparison of Republican distortions about Health Care Reform to the technique used by Nazi's called "The Big Lie." This technique of course, is that if one repeats a lie or distortion over and over again, with full conviction, it may eventually be believed and become "truth." It is a similar theme to what you may remember in George Orwell's book 1984 where history books were changed routinely according to the political leanings of the state. Truth was what they wanted you to believe - not actual truth.

Even Jon Stewart in this episode of the Daily Show (click HERE) takes Cohen to task. Stewart has been extremely articulate in calling people out for playing the "Nazi Card" in inappropriate situations. Rachel Maddow went even further in stating that the Holocaust should never be used as a comparison. She took Stewart's "Only Nazi's are Nazi's" comment a step further and expressed that it is actually morally wrong to compare anyone to what the Nazi's did.

In this situation, and in this over-reaching by Maddow, I must reject this version of the argument. Stewart and Maddow are basically right. Far too many analogies to Nazi's are thrown around these days - and mostly by the right in describing liberal figures they think will lead us down a path toward totalitarianism or communism. In this case however, Steve Cohen was doing the opposite. He was using the APPROPRIATE lessons of the Holocaust to try to prevent a very similar repeating of its style, approach, and goals. He may not have done it as articulately as he could have. (He could have for example said explicitly that he was not calling anyone a Nazi, but that he was using the Holocaust as a lens to view an important lesson - something History classes do every year.)

Yes - the "Big Lie" as he presented it, is the way Nazi's and numerous political movements have tried to shape the political debate their way. There have been few political issues in our lifetimes that have been as warped as the Health Reform movement has been. And this particular effort has a few too many similarities to more nefarious efforts (rather than just politicians making arguments in the press). This effort was driven be calculated businessmen, lobbyists, politicians, and pundits and has changed what should be an important debate to a South Park like temper tantrum where people get all the facts wrong, get their opinion from the repetitious pounding of talking heads, and do the bidding of others who have interests clearly opposite from theirs. If this does not deserve at least a quick mention of how the most stark example in History also used, demonization, disinformation, and eventually violence to get its way - then I don't know what does.

The Holocaust remains one of History's greatest lessons about propaganda and the manipulation of people for political goals. It CAN be used without calling someone a Nazi and without people always thinking they are being called Nazi's.


Let's not run too far away from the the use of the Holocaust as a lesson for fear that we forget its lessons entirely. Lets not dismiss its use for fear that those using similar propaganda tools prevail in turning our eyes from their damning connection to the same demonization and fear mongering central to the success that most vial of political movements.

---